[54] How 90 Objections and £3,500 Monthly Interest Shaped an Underground House
Map data: Google - Image: Landsat / Copernicus

Location

Build Start

Architect

Total Floor Area

Tim and Zoë Bawtree set out to replace their draughty Regency townhouse with an efficient underground home built in its garden. Their proposal attracted a reported 90 objections, while the project exposed them to £3,500 a month in interest as they waited for the original house to sell. An unfamiliar construction system, serious leaks and an £80,000 claim against their fixed-price contract added further pressure. This review examines how the restricted plot shaped the design, why the financial risks became connected and whether the finished home justified the difficult route taken to build it.

Site Purchase Price

Site Area

Site Cost Per m²

Initial Budget

Total Spend

Budget Overspend

Cost Per m²

Site Coverage

Plot Ratio

Land V Build Costs

Land 58%
Build 42%
All Figures Indexed To

Construction Type

Materials

Features

Tim and Zoë Bawtree set out to replace their draughty Regency townhouse with an efficient underground home built in its garden. Their proposal attracted a reported 90 objections, while the project exposed them to £3,500 a month in interest as they waited for the original house to sell. An unfamiliar construction system, serious leaks and an £80,000 claim against their fixed-price contract added further pressure. This review examines how the restricted plot shaped the design, why the financial risks became connected and whether the finished home justified the difficult route taken to build it.

Become a (free) member to keep reading

To help protect my work from web scraping, I've placed it behind this membership wall. Join today to get access to all content for free.

Already an MTBO Member? Log in to MTBO

Acknowledgment:

This is a non-commercial review carried out for the purposes of study in developing an understanding of the requirements of self-build in the UK.

The views and opinions expressed are my own and is not affiliated in any way with Grand Designs or Channel 4.  All information on this page has been gathered from publicly available sources.

The plot/site information was located using Land Registry and The Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities Data which contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

The lessons learned are derived from my interpretations and observations of a publicly disseminated case study and are in no way meant to be a substitute to the original.

More
Reviews

Log in to read this content

We'll email you a magic code to log you in without a password.